Tuesday, September 23, 2014

How the development of Engineering Expertise in Malaysia was derailed

If you examine the annual Auditor General’s reports, it is apparent that the government department lacks technical expertise in drafting requirements specifications, tender specifications, planning, coordination, design, tender evaluation, project implementation, supervision, quality control, testing, and so on.  This resulted in projects that are not useful, designs that are not practical, poor quality and workmanship, structural failures, wrong material used, late or non-deliveries, abandoned projects, and many other defects.  This list goes on and on and at great cost to the government and inconvenience and loss of opportunity to the citizens who were the intended beneficiaries of these projects. Somehow somewhere along the line since the formation of Malaysia, the development of our engineering expertise was derailed. This happened both in the public and private sectors.

Engineering is both an art and a science.  We can learn science in universities, but art requires practical experience.  Unlike other professions, engineering projects and product cycles can take a long time, usually in years and multiples thereof. A good engineer would, therefore, take many years of intense training through the numerous engineering processes.  In addition to this, an engineering manager would also need training in management science and practices.